Una mirada crítica a la teoría del signo
Files
Date
Authors
Subject
Sign
sign language
semiology
linguistics
linguistic change
signo
lenguaje de signos
semiología
cambio lingüístico
sign language
semiology
linguistics
linguistic change
signo
lenguaje de signos
semiología
cambio lingüístico
Language:
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC)
En este estudio se reivindica el carácter multiplánico del signo lingüístico, el papel del mismo en todo proceso cognitivo y el acierto de Saussure al enfatizar la esencia psíquica o mental del significante. Si bien erró al descartar el aspecto material del signo lingüístico, la originalidad y agudeza de su acierto lo hace merecedor de un puesto cimero en la historia de la teoría del signo. También se revisa las teorías del signo de Charles Sanders, Louis Hjemslev y Charles Morris para formular una propuesta que recoge los aportes de los cuatro teóricos precedentes y reivindicar el objeto o referente del signo de Saussure, el aspecto mental tanto del significante como del significado; de Hjemslev, la sustancia de los dos planos del signo; y de Morris, el sujeto de la semiosis, el intérprete. A partir de la lectura de los cuatro teóricos objeto de este estudio y de los que componen y de los que componen el marco teórico se expone que solo Saussure y Hjemslev le dan un tratamiento realmente multiplánico al signo lingüístico; y que la imagen acústica o logogén del significante, y la imagen mental o concepto del significado tienen repercusiones en la didáctica, en la epistemología, en la filosofía del lenguaje y en la logopedia.
In this study, the multiplanic character of the linguistic sign, its role in all cognitive processes and Saussure’s success in emphasizing the mental or mental essence of the signifier are claimed. Although he erred in ruling out the material aspect of the linguistic sign, the originality and sharpness of his success makes him deserving of a top position in the history of sign theory. The theories of the sign of Charles Sanders, Louis Hjemslev and Charles Morris are also reviewed to formulate a proposal that gathers the contributions of the four preceding theorists and to vindicate the object or referent of Saussure’s sign, the mental aspect of both the signifier and the signified; of Hjemslev, the substance of the two planes of the sign; and Morris, the subject of semiosis, the interpreter. From the reading of the four theorists object of this study and of those who compose and of those who compose the theoretical framework, it is exposed that only Saussure and Hjemslev give a truly multiplanic treatment to the linguistic sign; and that the acoustic or logogenic image of the signifier, and the mental image or concept of the meaning have repercussions in didactics, in epistemology, in the philosophy of language and in speech therapy.
In this study, the multiplanic character of the linguistic sign, its role in all cognitive processes and Saussure’s success in emphasizing the mental or mental essence of the signifier are claimed. Although he erred in ruling out the material aspect of the linguistic sign, the originality and sharpness of his success makes him deserving of a top position in the history of sign theory. The theories of the sign of Charles Sanders, Louis Hjemslev and Charles Morris are also reviewed to formulate a proposal that gathers the contributions of the four preceding theorists and to vindicate the object or referent of Saussure’s sign, the mental aspect of both the signifier and the signified; of Hjemslev, the substance of the two planes of the sign; and Morris, the subject of semiosis, the interpreter. From the reading of the four theorists object of this study and of those who compose and of those who compose the theoretical framework, it is exposed that only Saussure and Hjemslev give a truly multiplanic treatment to the linguistic sign; and that the acoustic or logogenic image of the signifier, and the mental image or concept of the meaning have repercussions in didactics, in epistemology, in the philosophy of language and in speech therapy.
Description
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Source
Science and Society; Vol. 45 No. 2 (2020): Science and Society; 65-77
Ciencia y Sociedad; Vol. 45 Núm. 2 (2020): Ciencia y Sociedad; 65-77
2613-8751
0378-7680
10.22206/cys.2020.v45i2
Ciencia y Sociedad; Vol. 45 Núm. 2 (2020): Ciencia y Sociedad; 65-77
2613-8751
0378-7680
10.22206/cys.2020.v45i2