Pre-transaccional, transaccional y post-transaccional: categorías para reconocer la injusticia epistémica
Date
Subject
epistemología social
transacción epistémica
injusticia hermenéutica
injusticia testimonial
injusticia cognitiva
ética
social epistemology
epistemic transactions
hermeneutical injustice
testimonial injustice
cognitive injustice
ethics
transacción epistémica
injusticia hermenéutica
injusticia testimonial
injusticia cognitiva
ética
social epistemology
epistemic transactions
hermeneutical injustice
testimonial injustice
cognitive injustice
ethics
Language:
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo (INTEC)
La injusticia epistémica (IE) constituye una forma de discriminación que, aunque en principio puede afectar a cualquier individuo, se manifiesta predominantemente contra aquellos asociados con grupos marginados. Se parte de la premisa de que la teorización sobre la IE, junto con conceptos relacionados —como el de injusticia cognitiva, por ejemplo— puede servir para esclarecer diversas formas de opresión. Cuando se observa el discurso académico en torno a la IE, puede verse que se han realizado valiosas propuestas de diversos estudiosos del tema; sin embargo la investigación se ha centrado principalmente en delinear y otorgar contenido práctico al concepto al revelar sus múltiples manifestaciones. Aún persiste una notable ausencia de un marco teórico que proporcione una clasificación exhaustiva o que al menos permita articular las variadas formas en que ocurre el fenómeno. El presente estudio, fundamentado en una extensa revisión de trabajos en los que se tratan tipologías y enfoques para comprender el fenómeno, busca contribuir a cerrar esta brecha. En ese sentido se presenta una propuesta conceptual ampliada de la IE —originada en el acceso, producción y reproducción del conocimiento— que termina en una categorización que, aunque abarca las variedades de IE identificadas en la literatura, se presenta como un marco abierto, con la intención y aspiración explícitas de que pueda albergar también cualquier ulterior manifestación del fenómeno que pueda ser revelada en otras investigaciones. Para estos fines se ha conceptualizado la transacción epistémica como el proceso central alrededor del cual ocurren las diversas manifestaciones de IE, y se propone, consecuentemente, la injusticia pre-transaccional, transaccional y post-transaccional como categorías primarias.
Epistemic injustice (EI) constitutes a type of discrimination that, while in principle can affect any individual, manifests predominantly against those associated with marginalized groups. It is based on the premise that theorizing about EI, along with related concepts—such as cognitive injustice, for example—can serve to elucidate various forms of oppression. When examining the academic discourse surrounding EI, it can be observed that valuable proposals have been made by various scholars in the field; however, research has primarily focused on delineating and providing practical content to the concept by revealing its multiple manifestations. There remains a notable absence of a theoretical framework that provides an exhaustive classification or at least allows for the articulation of the varied forms in which the phenomenon occurs. The present study, grounded in an extensive review of works addressing typologies and approaches to understanding the phenomenon, seeks to contribute to closing this gap. In this regard, an expanded conceptual proposal of EI is presented—originating in the access, production, and reproduction of knowledge—which culminates in a categorization that, while encompassing the varieties of EI identified in the literature, is presented as an open framework, with the explicit intention and aspiration that it may also accommodate any further manifestation of the phenomenon that might be revealed in other investigations. For these purposes, the epistemic transaction has been conceptualized as the central process around which the various manifestations of EI occur, and consequently, pre-transactional, transactional, and post-transactional injustice are proposed as primary categories.
Epistemic injustice (EI) constitutes a type of discrimination that, while in principle can affect any individual, manifests predominantly against those associated with marginalized groups. It is based on the premise that theorizing about EI, along with related concepts—such as cognitive injustice, for example—can serve to elucidate various forms of oppression. When examining the academic discourse surrounding EI, it can be observed that valuable proposals have been made by various scholars in the field; however, research has primarily focused on delineating and providing practical content to the concept by revealing its multiple manifestations. There remains a notable absence of a theoretical framework that provides an exhaustive classification or at least allows for the articulation of the varied forms in which the phenomenon occurs. The present study, grounded in an extensive review of works addressing typologies and approaches to understanding the phenomenon, seeks to contribute to closing this gap. In this regard, an expanded conceptual proposal of EI is presented—originating in the access, production, and reproduction of knowledge—which culminates in a categorization that, while encompassing the varieties of EI identified in the literature, is presented as an open framework, with the explicit intention and aspiration that it may also accommodate any further manifestation of the phenomenon that might be revealed in other investigations. For these purposes, the epistemic transaction has been conceptualized as the central process around which the various manifestations of EI occur, and consequently, pre-transactional, transactional, and post-transactional injustice are proposed as primary categories.
Description
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículos evaluados por pares
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículos evaluados por pares
Source
Science and Society; Vol. 49 No. 3 (2024): Science and Society; 9-32
Ciencia y Sociedad; Vol. 49 Núm. 3 (2024): Ciencia y Sociedad; 9-32
2613-8751
0378-7680
10.22206/cys.2024.v49i3
Ciencia y Sociedad; Vol. 49 Núm. 3 (2024): Ciencia y Sociedad; 9-32
2613-8751
0378-7680
10.22206/cys.2024.v49i3